Abstract
BackgroundAccurate identification of crop cultivars is crucial in assessing the impact of crop improvement research outputs. Two commonly used identification approaches, elicitation of variety names from farmer interviews and morphological plant descriptors, have inherent uncertainty levels. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) was used in a case study as an alternative method to track released varieties in farmers’ fields, using cassava, a clonally propagated root crop widely grown in the tropics, and often disseminated through extension services and informal seed systems. A total of 917 accessions collected from 495 farming households across Ghana were genotyped at 56,489 SNP loci along with a “reference library” of 64 accessions of released varieties and popular landraces.ResultsAccurate cultivar identification and ancestry estimation was accomplished through two complementary clustering methods: (i) distance-based hierarchical clustering; and (ii) model-based maximum likelihood admixture analysis. Subsequently, 30 % of the identified accessions from farmers’ fields were matched to specific released varieties represented in the reference library. ADMIXTURE analysis revealed that the optimum number of major varieties was 11 and matched the hierarchical clustering results. The majority of the accessions (69 %) belonged purely to one of the 11 groups, while the remaining accessions showed two or more ancestries. Further analysis using subsets of SNP markers reproduced results obtained from the full-set of markers, suggesting that GBS can be done at higher DNA multiplexing, thereby reducing the costs of variety fingerprinting. A large proportion of discrepancy between genetically unique cultivars as identified by markers and variety names as elicited from farmers were observed. Clustering results from ADMIXTURE analysis was validated using the assumption-free Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) method.ConclusionWe show that genome-wide SNP markers from increasingly affordable GBS methods coupled with complementary cluster analysis is a powerful tool for fine-scale population structure analysis and variety identification. Moreover, the ancestry estimation provides a framework for quantifying the contribution of exotic germplasm or older improved varieties to the genetic background of contemporary improved cultivars.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0273-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Accurate identification of crop cultivars is crucial in assessing the impact of crop improvement research outputs
Field sampling Field surveys found that farmers cultivated between one and five different varieties of cassava in their fields, but majority of them (>80 %) grow only one or two varieties (Fig. 2)
A large number of unique farmer-elicited variety names (180) were associated with the 917 accessions collected from the three study regions of Ghana
Summary
Accurate identification of crop cultivars is crucial in assessing the impact of crop improvement research outputs. Successful dissemination and adoption of improved varieties from both private and public breeding programs is expected to contribute positively to farm-level productivity and income generation It is the role of household level impact assessment studies, collection of variety specific adoption data, to determine whether this is happening [3, 4]. Estimation of improved variety adoption in socio-economic impact studies relies mostly on: expert opinion of breeders, extension services and other experts; elicited responses from farmers in farmer-level surveys; and morphological descriptors. Such methods have several inherent uncertainty levels. The number of descriptors can be quite limited as varieties are developed to conform to desired ideotypes, greatly reducing the power to distinguish consanguineous varieties [7]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.