Abstract

Food availability may vary spatially and temporally within an environment. Efficiency in locating alternative food sources using spatial information (e.g., distribution patterns) may vary according to a species’ diet and habitat specialisation. Hypothetically, more generalist species would learn faster than more specialist species due to being more explorative when changes occur. We tested this hypothesis in two closely related macaw species, differing in their degree of diet and habitat specialisation; the more generalist Great Green Macaw and the more specialist Blue-throated Macaw. We examined their spatial pattern learning performance under predictable temporal and spatial change, using a ‘poke box’ that contained hidden food placed within wells. Each week, the rewarded wells formed two patterns (A and B), which were changed on a mid-week schedule. We found that the two patterns varied in their difficulty. We also found that the more generalist Great Green Macaws took fewer trials to learn the easier pattern and made more mean correct responses in the difficult pattern than the more specialist Blue-throated Macaws, thus supporting our hypothesis. The better learning performance of the Great Green Macaws may be explained by more exploration and trading-off accuracy for speed. These results suggest how variation in diet and habitat specialisation may relate to a species’ ability to adapt to spatial variation in food availability.

Highlights

  • Many species encounter spatial and temporal fluctuations of food availability in their natural environment

  • Species that are more specialised in diet have been shown to pay more attention to specific information than generalists [5]

  • The aim of this study is to examine the role of diet and habitat specialisation in relation to acquiring predictably changing spatial information

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many species encounter spatial and temporal fluctuations of food availability in their natural environment. To deal with the variability in the environment, foragers may utilise spatial (e.g., distribution patterns) and specific (e.g., visual cues) environmental information to increase foraging efficiency [1,2,3,4]. The extent to which a species may use this information to locate food resources, may depend on ecological factors such as diet and habitat specialisation. Species that are more specialised in diet have been shown to pay more attention to specific information than generalists [5]. Being more sensitive to specific or relevant information may allow specialists to excel at manipulating certain food types efficiently in stable environments [6,7], or when encountering different but similar problems [8]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call