Abstract

TDR measures the rate of vibration decay along rail in dB/m. Higher TDR leads to lower noise radiation. However, new railways are often having low TDR due to the use of resilient fasteners (to provide vibration isolation between rail and supporting structure for ground borne noise concerns), which leads to high noise radiation. Rail damper is used to increase TDR (thus reduces railway noise), where TMD is an efficient damping mechanism dissipating the vibration energy of the rail. TMD provides reactive damping force, maximised after a few cycles of oscillations. TMD force is stronger with continuous excitation than impulse excitation. For convenient purposes in the industry, TDR measurements are primarily conducted by impulse method, which do not allow sufficient time to include reactive TMD force. Therefore, impulse excitation TDR is smaller than continuous excitation TDR. Continuous excitation TDR is considered to reflect more of the real case of wheel/rail interaction excitation during train running. Besides, TDR in terms of time decay in dB/s is an alternative approach for evaluating noise performance of the rail. This paper presents TDR measurement results under different conditions, e.g., impulse excitation against continuous excitation; freely supported short rail (~6m), short rail (~6m) with resilient fastener support as well as site measurements in continuous welded rails.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call