Abstract

Summary form only given. The problem of track-to-track association and track fusion has been considered in the literature where the local trackers assume the same target motion model and send their local state estimates to the fusion center on demand. Many issues arise when local trackers use different target motion models or even operate on different target state spaces. In this case, selecting an appropriate track association method at the fusion center is essential to the performance of the overall tracking system. In this paper, we examine several track association methods with different assumptions on the target distribution in a surveillance region. We found that the track association performance can be very different among these methods even when they have the same desired significance level of the correct association probability. We recommend to use the track association method that best approximates the likelihood ratio test with complete knowledge of the target distribution. In addition, existing track fusion techniques have to be modified to account for the model mismatch among some of the local trackers. The track association and fusion problem is illustrated by a two dimensional tracking example with both radar tracks and electronic support measures (ESM) tracks.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.