Abstract

Objectives:The rising percentage of patients scheduled for primary CABG with HbA1c>8.6% is alarming reflecting higher burden on the patient, operative procedure and the operating surgeon. Although some articles in the literature argue that decompensated diabetes increases mortality and morbidity, other studies are arguing that there is no relation between them. This study aims at tracing the occurrence of the proposed adverse complications after primary CABG operations related to HbA1c values>8.6% in diabetics subjected to tight glycemic control; in a trial to conclude how far the value of HbA1c could be accepted to carry out the surgery safely. Methods:This prospective study included 80 adult diabetic patients who presented with IHD requiring primary CABG. It was conducted between January 2016 and December 2018. Group (I) included 42 patients with HbA1c values 8.6%. We compared the following: perioperative MI, low cardiac output syndrome, operative mortality, rhythmic complications, hemorrhagic complications, respiratory complications, cerebrovascular accidents, acute renal failure development, superficial and deep surgical wounds infections, overall hospital complications and overall one-year mortality and survival. Results: Mean HbA1c% value was 7.5 ± 1.11% for group (I) and 9.3 ± 1.03% for group (II). Prior to surgery, the mean FBG level was 136.9±41.7 mg/dl for group (I) and 152.2±27.3 mg/dl for group (II) with tight glycemic control measures. Although group (II) showed higher values in the studied parameters (pre-, intra- and post-operatively), no statistically significant differences appeared between the two subsets of patients regarding the proposed adverse complications. The overall hospital complication rate was 13(30.95%) and 14(36.84%) for group (I) and (II) respectively (p>0.05). In the follow-up period, both groups expressed comparable results with no statistical significance. The overall one-year survival was 95.23% and 94.73% in group (I) and (II) respectively (p>0.05) and the overall mortality was 5% (two deaths from each group) (p>0.05). Conclusion:Although patients with IHD undergoing primary CABG and having decompensated diabetes with HbA1c values>8.6% have more insulted cardiovascular condition, these higher HbA1c values do not add more additional impact on the proposed adverse intra- and postoperative complications as with lower values with the aid of strict (tight) glycemic control measures in the immediate preoperative period.

Highlights

  • About 25-30% of patients undergoing primary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) surgery suffer from diabetes [1]

  • This study is conducted to trace the occurrence of the proposed unfavourable adverse complications that are expected to happen after primary CABG operations related to HbA1c values higher than 8.6% in diabetic patients subjected to tight blood glucose level control using insulin therapy in a trial to conclude how far the value of HbA1c could be accepted to carry out the surgery safely

  • Once the patients were transferred to the zone area or regular room, blood glucose values were obtained every 4-6 hours and subjected to strict glycemic control measures using different doses of insulin therapy aiming to keep blood glucose measures 110-150 mg/dl via combination of scheduled subcutaneous insulin therapy and repeated insulin injections according to Matias protocol [17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

About 25-30% of patients undergoing primary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) surgery suffer from diabetes [1]. It is an independent risk factor for graft occlusion and cardiac deaths after myocardial revascularization. The risk of micro- and macroangiopathy is higher when glycemia is poorly controlled [2]. Poor glycemia control in the perioperative period of the CABG surgery adversly affects the postoperative results [3]. It has been reported that postoperative outcomes improve in diabetic. International Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2019; 5(2): 31-40 patients with a strict preoperative blood glucose control [4]. Glycemia control is measured by glycosylated hemoglobin

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call