Abstract
Author presents in this study 160 patients who underwent tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. This study represents authors experience in Indian perspective with regards to technique, timing of surgery, i.e., primary or secondary, effect of socioeconomic condition of the patients. Author also narrated complications secondary to the TEP voice and prosthesis, during long follow-up of 15years. The primary and secondary TEP were compared in patients having good socio-economical status with that of relatively poor status patients. As compared to the western literature, this Indian study showed significant differences in success rate of achieving good TEP voice production and also continuing use of TEP voice. Author observed that despite, entirely different socio economic condition and lack of proper follow-up, the secondary TEP done after complete evaluation of the patient yields much better sustained results for successful voice acquisition and continuation of the use of acquired voice. Author has described in details about the surgical procedures for secondary TEP; the prosthesis, care of prosthesis, problems due to TEP and prosthesis and the ways to rectify these problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
