Traceability in perspective

Abstract

Results that reference SI units rarely pose problems in chemical measurement because traceable standards, with uncertainties derived from a chain of calibrations from the SI, are readily available at the analyst’s bench. These uncertainties are nearly always far smaller than that required for fitness for purpose in the analytical result. Moreover, the greater part of the uncertainty in a typical result is not derived from primary measurements traceable to the SI but from recovery problems and matrix effects. Even so, the incidence of wildly inaccurate results stems not from this uncertainty but from “blunders”, deviations from the correct procedure. Attention to traceability beyond that employed by any competent analyst therefore cannot reduce the uncertainty. Furthermore, there is no rational reason to reduce the uncertainty if the result is already fit for purpose. The current focus on traceability is distracting analysts from the more pressing task of eliminating blunders.