Abstract

Trace eyeblink conditioning is useful for studying the interaction of multiple brain areas in learning and memory. The goal of the current work was to determine whether trace eyeblink conditioning could be established in a mouse model in the absence of elicited startle responses and the brain circuitry that supports this learning. We show here that mice can acquire trace conditioned responses (tCRs) devoid of startle while head-restrained and permitted to freely run on a wheel. Most mice (75%) could learn with a trace interval of 250 ms. Because tCRs were not contaminated with startle-associated components, we were able to document the development and timing of tCRs in mice, as well as their long-term retention (at 7 and 14 d) and flexible expression (extinction and reacquisition). To identify the circuitry involved, we made restricted lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and found that learning was prevented. Furthermore, inactivation of the cerebellum with muscimol completely abolished tCRs, demonstrating that learned responses were driven by the cerebellum. Finally, inactivation of the mPFC and amygdala in trained animals nearly abolished tCRs. Anatomical data from these critical regions showed that mPFC and amygdala both project to the rostral basilar pons and overlap with eyelid-associated pontocerebellar neurons. The data provide the first report of trace eyeblink conditioning in mice in which tCRs were driven by the cerebellum and required a localized region of mPFC for acquisition. The data further reveal a specific role for the amygdala as providing a conditioned stimulus-associated input to the cerebellum.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIt can be challenging to develop associative learning and memory tasks in rodents without engaging startle circuitry, with the use of acoustic stimuli

  • Awake behaving mice offer many advantages for studying higher cognitive function

  • Using functional inactivation paired with anatomical tracers, we further identify the trace eyeblink conditioning circuitry in the mouse model that underlies this basic associative learning task, including a more refined role for how amygdala inputs might support this task in the absence of conditioned stimulus-evoked startle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It can be challenging to develop associative learning and memory tasks in rodents without engaging startle circuitry, with the use of acoustic stimuli. Rodents show pronounced acoustic startle, which results in a fast motor response (Ͻ50 ms) that includes the facial muscles (Koch, 1999). Trace conditioning includes a stimulus-free interval between the CS and US, whereas the stimuli overlap in delay conditioning. Both trace and delay conditioning require the cerebellum to drive motor output, trace conditioning has been shown to require forebrain regions, such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus (Steinmetz et al, 1989; Kim et al, 1995; Kronforst-Collins and Disterhoft, 1998; Weiss et al, 1999; Takehara et al, 2003; Tseng et al, 2004; Kalmbach et al, 2009, 2010b; Siegel and Mauk, 2013; Chen et al, 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call