Trace DNA and its persistence on various surfaces: A long term study investigating the influence of surface type and environmental conditions – Part two, non-metals

Abstract

The work presented herein is the second part of a large-scale persistence project aimed at identifying trends in trace DNA persistence. This study aims to show how different environmental storage conditions and target surface characteristics influence the persistence of cellular and cell free DNA (cfDNA) over time. To eliminate variation within the experiment, we used a proxy DNA deposit consisting of a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and/or cfDNA. Samples were collected and analysed from eight non-metal surfaces over the course of 1 year (27 time points) under three different environmental storage conditions. The results of this experiment show that surface characteristics in conjunction with DNA type greatly influence DNA persistence. Variation in the amount of DNA recovered over time was greatly influenced by surface porosity. CfDNA persisted at significantly higher levels on non-porous surfaces, and cellular DNA persisted at higher levels on porous items. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in DNA persistence were found among the items classified as non-porous surfaces and among the items classified as porous surfaces. Additionally, this study showed that the sample storage environment had a larger impact on DNA persistence than previously observed for metal surfaces [1]. When considering DNA type, cellular DNA was shown to persist for longer than cfDNA and persistence as a whole appears to be better when DNA is deposited alone rather than in mixtures. Unsurprisingly, it was found that the amount of DNA recovered from trace deposits decreased over time. However, DNA decay is highly dependent on the surface type and exhibits higher variability at short time points and on porous surfaces. For each of the surfaces tested, DNA persisted 1 year past deposition (in some combination of DNA type and environmental condition), except for wood, on which DNA did not persist in any capacity past four months. This data is intended to add to our understanding of DNA persistence and the factors which affect it.