Abstract

The use of post-processing heat treatments is often considered a necessary approach to relax high-magnitude residual stresses (RS) formed during the layerwise additive manufacturing laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). In this work, three heat treatment strategies using temperatures of 450 °C, 800 °C, and 900 °C are applied to austenitic stainless steel 316L samples manufactured by LPBF. These temperatures encompass the suggested lower and upper bounds of heat treatment temperatures of conventionally processed 316L. The relaxation of the RS is characterized by neutron diffraction (ND), and the associated changes of the microstructure are analyzed using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The lower bound heat treatment variant of 450 °C for 4 hours exhibited high tensile and compressive RS. When applying subsequent heat treatments, we show that stress gradients are still observed after applying 800 °C for 1 hour but almost completely vanish when applying 900 °C for 1 hour. The observed near complete relaxation of the RS appears to be closely related to the evolution of the characteristic subgrain solidification cellular microstructure.

Highlights

  • ADDITIVE manufacturing (AM) has been the focus of many studies over the past two decades

  • The analysis of stress relaxation in shot-peened 316 Almen strips reported in Reference 32 shows that a relaxation of about 38 pct is resulting from a heat treatment at 900 °C

  • This is in contradiction with the results for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 316L reported in References 23,24,26

Read more

Summary

Introduction

ADDITIVE manufacturing (AM) has been the focus of many studies over the past two decades. The TGM is a solid-state mechanisms and does not require the material to be molten compared to the cool-down phase model.[4,5] In the cool-down phase model, the contraction of the solidifying material is constrained by the surrounding solidified material, leading to misfit and, acting as source for the formation of RS. Both these mechanisms tend to generate tensile RS at the top deposited region, balanced by surrounding compressive RS (beneath or adjacent). The effects of TGM and cool-down model (referred to as solidification shrinkage) were further investigated in Reference 6 to understand their individual contribution to the formation of METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.