Abstract

South Africa’s incessant Corporate Law Reforms do offer vast opportunities for rural communities to be actively involved in their own social and economic development. This article discusses the practicability of using a private company to promote and develop social and economic interests of rural communities. The fundamental question is: what constitute proper administration and socio-economic development in a rural context? It takes into account, the fact that the post-1994 democratic dispensation has made some effort to develop and strengthen the constitutional property rights, and the social and economic development of the previously disadvantaged rural communities. This encompassed the idea of, somewhat, relying on civil society institutions to manage and develop property rights of rural communities. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the success thereof is dubious since the development and operation of civil society institutions in these communities are constantly under threat and undermined by the tenacity of conflicts between administrators and the traditional leadership. It is asserted that there is an incessant need to resolve fundamental aspects relating to law, application of legal norms and achievement of social justice in a rural context.

Highlights

  • Underutilized in a rural community context, South Africa’s corporate law has evolved so tremendously that it is unavoidably necessary to explore the possibility of relying on a private company to promote and develop socio-economic property interests of rural communities

  • The only reference made to the registration of land in the name of a Communal Property Association, is where the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform is authorized to determine that the provisions of laws ruling the establishing of towns and the Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970 will not be applicable to land which is registered in the name of a Communal Property Association

  • This article has illustrated that various reasons may exist to justify the believe that Communal Property Associations (CPAs) are not progressively suitable as entities that can best manage communal property and socio-economic interests of rural communities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Underutilized in a rural community context, South Africa’s corporate law has evolved so tremendously that it is unavoidably necessary to explore the possibility of relying on a private company to promote and develop socio-economic property interests of rural communities. This is significant in the context of advancing such constitutional transformative ideals that emanated from corporate law reform, which amongst others, sought to inculcate improved governance, accountability and sustainability in the corporate world. The article shall demonstrate why a private company is best suited for serving the developmental social and economic interests of rural communities

Theoretical framework
Participatory action research philosophy
Ownership in land in South Africa’s context
The constitutional property clause
Traditional ownership
Communal ownership
Diverging economic interests
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call