Abstract

Abstract. Today, humans have a critical impact on the Earth system and vice versa, which can generate complex feedback processes between social and ecological dynamics. Integrating human behavior into formal Earth system models (ESMs), however, requires crucial modeling assumptions about actors and their goals, behavioral options, and decision rules, as well as modeling decisions regarding human social interactions and the aggregation of individuals' behavior. Here, we review existing modeling approaches and techniques from various disciplines and schools of thought dealing with human behavior at different levels of decision making. We demonstrate modelers' often vast degrees of freedom but also seek to make modelers aware of the often crucial consequences of seemingly innocent modeling assumptions. After discussing which socioeconomic units are potentially important for ESMs, we compare models of individual decision making that correspond to alternative behavioral theories and that make diverse modeling assumptions about individuals' preferences, beliefs, decision rules, and foresight. We review approaches to model social interaction, covering game theoretic frameworks, models of social influence, and network models. Finally, we discuss approaches to studying how the behavior of individuals, groups, and organizations can aggregate to complex collective phenomena, discussing agent-based, statistical, and representative-agent modeling and economic macro-dynamics. We illustrate the main ingredients of modeling techniques with examples from land-use dynamics as one of the main drivers of environmental change bridging local to global scales.

Highlights

  • Even though Earth system models (ESMs) are used to study human impacts on the complex interdependencies between various compartments of the Earth, humans are not represented explicitly in these models

  • As we have shown in the examples above, there are many similarities regarding the choice of modeling techniques and assumptions in ESMs and models of socioeconomic systems

  • We could only discuss the basic aspects of the presented modeling techniques, it is apparent that modelers who want to include humans into ESMs are confronted with crucial choices of which assumptions to make about human behavior and which appropriate techniques to use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Even though Earth system models (ESMs) are used to study human impacts on the complex interdependencies between various compartments of the Earth, humans are not represented explicitly in these models. The IPCC process uses integrated assessment models to compute plausible future emission pathways from energy and land use for different scenarios of climate mitigation. These projections determine the radiative forcing used as external input in ESMs to study its natural impacts (Moss et al, 2010; IPCC, 2014). The latter can, have socioeconomic consequences that may be fed back into the scenario process.

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call