Abstract

Low-energy supersymmetric models such as the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM), and MSSM with vectorlike fermion are consistent with perturbative unification. While the nonminimal extensions naturally explain Higgs mass and dark matter in the low-energy region, it is unclear how seriously they are constrained in the ultraviolet region. Our study shows the following. First, in the case of embedding the MSSM into SU(5) the fit to standard model fermion masses requires a singlet $S$, which leads to unviable embedding of the NMSSM into SU(5) because such $S$ feeds singlet $N$ a mass of order unification scale as well. Second, a similar result holds in the case of embedding the NMSSM into SO(10), where $S$ is replaced by some Higgs fields responsible for SO(10) breaking. Third, on the contrary, for the embedding of the MSSM with 16-dimensional vectorlike fermions into SO(10), the Higgs field responsible for the vectorlike mass of order tera-electron-volts scale can evade those problems the singlet $N$ encounters because of an intermediate mass scale in the 126-dimensional Higgs field.

Highlights

  • Sibo Zheng*Low-energy supersymmetric models such as the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM), and MSSM with vectorlike fermion are consistent with perturbative unification

  • At the frontiers of new physics, beyond the standard model (SM) natural or tera electron volt–scale supersymmetry (SUSY) offers us a grand unification (GUT) of SM gauge coupling constants [1,2,3,4]

  • According to the observed Higgs mass at the LHC and the dark matter direct detection limits, the conventional minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM)—the simplest natural SUSY that is consistent with unification—is under more pressure than ever

Read more

Summary

Sibo Zheng*

Low-energy supersymmetric models such as the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM), and MSSM with vectorlike fermion are consistent with perturbative unification. In the case of embedding the MSSM into SU(5) the fit to standard model fermion masses requires a singlet S, which leads to unviable embedding of the NMSSM into SU(5) because such S feeds singlet N a mass of order unification scale as well. A similar result holds in the case of embedding the NMSSM into SO(10), where S is replaced by some Higgs fields responsible for SO(10) breaking. On the contrary, for the embedding of the MSSM with 16-dimensional vectorlike fermions into SO(10), the Higgs field responsible for the vectorlike mass of order tera-electron-volts scale can evade those problems the singlet N encounters because of an intermediate mass scale in the 126-dimensional Higgs field

INTRODUCTION
SIBO ZHENG
Benchmark solutions to the input parameters in
Weff ðρÞ
MY MX MV
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.