Abstract

Abstract. Wake interactions between wind turbines in wind farms lead to reduced energy extraction in downstream rows. In recent work, optimization and large-eddy simulation were combined with the optimal dynamic induction control of wind farms to study the mitigation of these effects, showing potential power gains of up to 20 % (Munters and Meyers, 2017, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 375, 20160100, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.010). However, the computational cost associated with these optimal control simulations impedes the practical implementation of this approach. Furthermore, the resulting control signals optimally react to the specific instantaneous turbulent flow realizations in the simulations so that they cannot be simply used in general. The current work focuses on the detailed analysis of the optimization results of Munters and Meyers, with the aim to identify simplified control strategies that mimic the optimal control results and can be used in practice. The analysis shows that wind-farm controls are optimized in a parabolic manner with little upstream propagation of information. Moreover, turbines can be classified into first-row, intermediate-row, and last-row turbines based on their optimal control dynamics. At the moment, the control mechanisms for intermediate-row turbines remain unclear, but for first-row turbines we find that the optimal controls increase wake mixing through the periodic shedding of vortex rings. This behavior can be mimicked with a simple sinusoidal thrust control strategy for first-row turbines, resulting in robust power gains for turbines in the entrance region of the farm.

Highlights

  • Wake interactions between turbines within a wind farm cause reduced power extraction and increased turbine loading in downstream rows

  • Analysis of the thrust coefficients and numerical experiments have shown a clear distinction between first-row turbines, last-row turbines, and intermediate turbines

  • Observations strongly suggest that the optimization works in a unidirectional way: upstream turbines influence the flow field, resulting in favorable conditions for their downstream neighbors, yet information on the possibility of active response and cooperation in the latter has no influence on upstream control actions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wake interactions between turbines within a wind farm cause reduced power extraction and increased turbine loading in downstream rows. Control strategies at the farm level allow the wake interaction to be influenced and promise to improve overall wind-farm performance by improving wind conditions for downstream turbines. This can be achieved by redirecting propagating wakes (yaw control; see, e.g., Fleming et al, 2014; Gebraad et al, 2016; Campagnolo et al, 2016) or by affecting the induced wake velocity deficits (axial induction control; see, e.g., Nilsson et al, 2015; Annoni et al, 2016; Bartl and Sætran, 2016).

Description of optimal control simulations in MM17
Control methodology
Case setup
Simulation results
Thrust coefficient analysis and numerical experiments
Analysis of thrust coefficient signals
Application of optimal thrust coefficients to subsets of turbine rows
Optimization of single active turbine rows
Modification of thrust coefficient signals
Discussion
First-row turbine behavior
Flow field visualization
Sinusoidal thrust variations
Parameter sweep
Robustness with respect to turbine spacing and turbulence intensity
Full-scale wind-farm LES
Findings
Intermediate-row turbine behavior
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call