Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the state-of-the-art for automated assessment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) from medical image data. However, these methods lack interpretability, mainly focus on image texture, and cannot completely grasp the analyzed anatomies’ shapes. In this study we assess the informative value of quantitative features derived from segmentations in order to assess their potential as an alternative or extension to CNN-based approaches regarding multiple aspects of KOA. Six anatomical structures around the knee (femoral and tibial bones, femoral and tibial cartilages, and both menisci) are segmented in 46,996 MRI scans. Based on these segmentations, quantitative features are computed, i.e., measurements such as cartilage volume, meniscal extrusion and tibial coverage, as well as geometric features based on a statistical shape encoding of the anatomies. The feature quality is assessed by investigating their association to the Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG), joint space narrowing (JSN), incident KOA, and total knee replacement (TKR). Using gold standard labels from the Osteoarthritis Initiative database the balanced accuracy (BA), the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), and weighted kappa statistics are evaluated. Features based on shape encodings of femur, tibia, and menisci plus the performed measurements showed most potential as KOA biomarkers. Differentiation between non-arthritic and severely arthritic knees yielded BAs of up to 99%, 84% were achieved for diagnosis of early KOA. Weighted kappa values of 0.73, 0.72, and 0.78 were achieved for classification of the grade of medial JSN, lateral JSN, and KLG, respectively. The AUC was 0.61 and 0.76 for prediction of incident KOA and TKR within one year, respectively. Quantitative features from automated segmentations provide novel biomarkers for KLG and JSN classification and show potential for incident KOA and TKR prediction. The validity of these features should be further evaluated, especially as extensions of CNN-based approaches. To foster such developments we make all segmentations publicly available together with this publication.

Highlights

  • Medical imaging has become the standard diagnostic means for assessing osteoarthritis

  • Various procedures have been proposed for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) diagnostics from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, such as manual image reading based on semi-quantitative scoring systems [4, 5], computerized quantitative analysis based on manual definitions of regions of interest (ROI) [6,7,8,9,10], up to fully automated methods based on machine learning [11, 12]

  • All results for classification of different grades of Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KLG) as well as joint space narrowing (JSN) are averaged over all time points of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medical imaging has become the standard diagnostic means for assessing osteoarthritis. Substantial efforts have been made in the past decades to identify image-based biomarkers and to develop methods for image-based assessment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) from conventional radiographs and tomographic image data. To rate KOA from X-Rays with the knee being in a load-bearing situation, the current gold standard is the Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KLG) [1], where e.g. radiographic joint narrowing (JSN) is measured. Various procedures have been proposed for KOA diagnostics from MRI data, such as manual image reading based on semi-quantitative scoring systems [4, 5], computerized quantitative analysis based on manual definitions of regions of interest (ROI) [6,7,8,9,10], up to fully automated methods based on machine learning [11, 12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call