Abstract

We calculate a class of three-loop Feynman diagrams which contribute to the next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic approximation for the width difference ΔΓs in the {B}_s-{overline{B}}_s system. The considered diagrams contain a closed fermion loop in a gluon propagator and constitute the order αs2Nf, where Nf is the number of light quarks. Our results entail a considerable correction in that order, if ΔΓs is expressed in terms of the pole mass of the bottom quark. If the overline{mathrm{MS}} scheme is used instead, the correction is much smaller. As a result, we find a decrease of the scheme dependence. Our result also indicates that the usually quoted value of the NLO renormalization scale dependence underestimates the perturbative error.

Highlights

  • The i, j are colour indices and V ± A means γμ(1 ± γ5) while S ± P stands for (1 ± γ5)

  • Ref. [20] has calculated some of the matrix elements appearing at order ΛQCD/mb and these results went into the last terms of eqs. (1.6) and (1.7)

  • Comparing eq (5.2) with eq (5.3) we find that the MS result is quite stable, if we change the literal αs2Nf result to the non-abelianization approach (NNA) one, while the pole-scheme result is not

Read more

Summary

Theoretical framework

It has been suggested to trade Nf for β0, so that the αs2Nf term is replaced by a term of order αs2β0 (naive non-abelianization [25, 26]) In some applications this procedure gives a good approximation to the full αs term. In quantities involving effective four-quark operators, it is pure speculation whether the original αs2Nf term or its naively non-abelianized version ∝ αs2β0 approximates the full result in a better way, because neither term cancels the scheme dependence of the operator renormalization. [27] revealed that the αs2β0 term is not a good approximation to the full result In light of this finding we do not advocate the use of naive non-abelianization in our case. One can overcome the scheme-dependence issue by only keeping the αs2Nf terms of the NNLO correction to the RG-improved Wilson coefficients. A future NNLO calculation keeping higher powers of z terms will benefit from these results

Renormalization and infrared regularization
Conclusions
A Full-theory matrix elements
Penguin operators
B Results of master integrals
Results for the two-particle cuts of the master integrals
Results for integrals with a b quark
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call