Abstract

In anticipation of future ubiquitously-connected healthcare services with stringent delay requirements, we outline the main characteristics, design challenges and existing open issues in the medium access control (MAC) layer design of wireless body area networks (WBANs) and highlight the need to define hybrid MAC frame that enables flexible access according to traffic and services. For the first time, a thorough investigation of two WBAN standards, namely the IEEE 802.15.6 WBAN and the recently-proposed ETSI SmartBAN, in terms of delay and energy, is presented. We provide insights into the impact of MAC frame timing structure on delay and energy performances of these existing protocols. We compare the selections of access durations for the SmartBAN hybrid MAC frame and IEEE 802.15.6 superframe. Then, we present our simulation comparisons of the uplink delay and energy consumption in a SmartBAN and a IEEE 802.15.16 WBAN for healthcare, taking into account periodic monitoring and health-critical emergency traffic patterns. Our results emphasize that compared to IEEE 802.15.6-defined WBANs, SmartBANs are advantageous in energy-saving. Moreover, with a time-optimized MAC, SmartBANs reduce the delay for both periodic monitoring and emergency report.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.