Abstract

Abstract We investigate the utility of large pretrained language models (PLMs) for automatic educational assessment question generation. While PLMs have shown increasing promise in a wide range of natural language applications, including question generation, they can generate unreliable and undesirable content. For high-stakes applications such as educational assessments, it is not only critical to ensure that the generated content is of high quality but also relates to the specific content being assessed. In this paper, we investigate the impact of various PLM prompting strategies on the quality of generated questions. We design a series of generation scenarios to evaluate various generation strategies and evaluate generated questions via automatic metrics and manual examination. With empirical evaluation, we identify the prompting strategy that is most likely to lead to high-quality generated questions. Finally, we demonstrate the promising educational utility of generated questions using our concluded best generation strategy by presenting generated questions together with human-authored questions to a subject matter expert, who despite their expertise, could not effectively distinguish between generated and human-authored questions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call