Abstract

BackgroundSeveral strategies are currently deployed in many countries in the tropics to strengthen malaria control toward malaria elimination. To measure the impact of any intervention, there is a need to detect malaria properly. Mostly, decisions still rely on microscopy diagnosis. But sensitive diagnosis tools enabling to deal with a large number of samples are needed. The molecular detection approach offers a much higher sensitivity, and the flexibility to be automated and upgraded.MethodsTwo new molecular methods were developed: dot18S, a Plasmodium-specific nested PCR based on the 18S rRNA gene followed by dot-blot detection of species by using species-specific probes and CYTB, a Plasmodium-specific nested PCR based on cytochrome b gene followed by species detection using SNP analysis. The results were compared to those obtained with microscopic examination and the "standard" 18S rRNA gene based nested PCR using species specific primers. 337 samples were diagnosed.ResultsCompared to the microscopy the three molecular methods were more sensitive, greatly increasing the estimated prevalence of Plasmodium infection, including P. malariae and P. ovale. A high rate of mixed infections was uncovered with about one third of the villagers infected with more than one malaria parasite species. Dot18S and CYTB sensitivity outranged the "standard" nested PCR method, CYTB being the most sensitive. As a consequence, compared to the "standard" nested PCR method for the detection of Plasmodium spp., the sensitivity of dot18S and CYTB was respectively 95.3% and 97.3%. Consistent detection of Plasmodium spp. by the three molecular methods was obtained for 83% of tested isolates. Contradictory results were mostly related to detection of Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale in mixed infections, due to an "all-or-none" detection effect at low-level parasitaemia.ConclusionA large reservoir of asymptomatic infections was uncovered using the molecular methods. Dot18S and CYTB, the new methods reported herein are highly sensitive, allow parasite DNA extraction as well as genus- and species-specific diagnosis of several hundreds of samples, and are amenable to high-throughput scaling up for larger sample sizes. Such methods provide novel information on malaria prevalence and epidemiology and are suited for active malaria detection. The usefulness of such sensitive malaria diagnosis tools, especially in low endemic areas where eradication plans are now on-going, is discussed in this paper.

Highlights

  • Several strategies are currently deployed in many countries in the tropics to strengthen malaria control toward malaria elimination

  • Molecular detection tools modify the interpretation of malaria epidemiology, by revealing large reservoirs of asymptomatic infections [8,12,13], cryptic species potentially influencing transmission patterns and clinical outcomes [14,15], as well as shifts in age distribution of Plasmodium spp. infections [16]

  • In September 2001, a baseline cross-sectional prevalence survey conducted by the European Commission-Cambodia Malaria Control Programme (ECMCP) team [19] included 36 "high-risk" villages, which had never been included in any bed net distribution project

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several strategies are currently deployed in many countries in the tropics to strengthen malaria control toward malaria elimination. Sensitive diagnosis tools enabling to deal with a large number of samples are needed. The first methods for molecular detection of Plasmodium falciparum malaria were published in the 1980s [1,2,3]. Various field surveys have shown that molecular methods detected up to eight times more Plasmodium spp. infections than microscopy, and that mixed infections could represent up to one third of them [8,9,10,11]. Molecular detection tools modify the interpretation of malaria epidemiology, by revealing large reservoirs of asymptomatic infections [8,12,13], cryptic species potentially influencing transmission patterns and clinical outcomes [14,15], as well as shifts in age distribution of Plasmodium spp. infections [16]. Most decisions for malaria control programmes still rely on data collected by health services, where malaria is diagnosed using microscopy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.