Abstract

Collection of information from crowdsourced and traditional sensing techniques during a disaster offers opportunities to exploit this new data source to enhance situational awareness, relief, and rescue coordination, and impact assessment. The evolution of disaster/crisis informatics affords the capability to process multi-modal data and to implement analytics in support of disaster management tasks. Little is known, however, about fairness in disaster informatics and the extent to which this issue affects disaster response. Often ignored is whether existing data analytics approaches reflect the impact of communities with equality, especially the underserved communities (i.e., minorities, the elderly, and the poor). We argue that disaster informatics has not systematically identified fairness issues, and such gaps may cause issues in decision making for and coordination of disaster response and relief. Furthermore, the isolating siloed nature of the domains of fairness, machine learning, and disaster informatics prevents interchange between these pursuits. This paper bridges the knowledge gap by evaluating potential fairness issues in disaster informatics tasks based on existing disaster informatics approaches and fairness assessment criteria. Specifically, we identify potential fairness issues in disaster event detection and impact assessment tasks. We review existing approaches that address potential fairness issues by modifying the data, analytics, and outputs. Finally, this paper proposes an overarching fairness-aware disaster informatics framework to structure the workflow of mitigating fairness issues. This paper not only unveils both the ignored and essential aspects of fairness issues in disaster informatics approaches but also bridges the silos which prevent the understanding of fairness between disaster informatics researchers and machine-learning researchers.

Highlights

  • Suitable communications and information management techniques are essential to inform efficient and effective decision making, operational coordination, and public information and warning before, during, and after disasters

  • To promote fairness in disaster informatics, this study argues that disaster informatics has not systematically identified fairness issues, and such gaps may cause decision making and coordination issues in disaster response and relief

  • This paper bridges the knowledge gap by evaluating the potential fairness issues in disaster informatics tasks based on existing disaster informatics approaches and fairness assessment criteria

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Suitable communications and information management techniques are essential to inform efficient and effective decision making, operational coordination, and public information and warning before, during, and after disasters. Disaster informatics techniques refer to the data-driven analytics approaches that improve situational awareness, decision making, and operational coordination in disaster management [6]–[8]. Examples of disaster informatics approaches include, but are not limited to, evaluating disaster impact based on social media posts and remote sensing for disaster damage assessment. This paper proposes a practical framework that mitigates fairness issues for data analytics tasks for disaster situational awareness. The proposed analytics framework allows disaster informatics researchers to become aware of potential fairness issues in existing works and identify directions for addressing these fairness issues.

BACKGROUND
FAIRNESS ISSUES IN IDENTIFYING DISASTER EVENTS
FAIRNESS ISSUES IN DISASTER IMPACT ASSESSMENT
CHOOSING FAIRNESS ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR DISASTER INFORMATICS TASKS
DISCRIMINATION MITIGATION APPROACHES
VISION
CASE STUDY
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call