Abstract
ABSTRACT One of the most important performance parameters for Assistive Devices (AD’s) based on Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) is the Information Transfer Rate (ITR). This study compares a hybrid BCI to a Steady State Visually Evoked Potential (SSVEP) based BCI, along with a comparison of classification techniques used for translation of user intentions. The hybrid BCI paradigm combined SSVEP & P300, where SSVEP decodes user intentions and P300 is used for Time Division Multiplexing (TDM). The classification protocols were categorised as single-step supervised classifiers and two-step unsupervised classifier. It was observed that the classification accuracy for translation of human intentions for the traditional SSVEP paradigm (93.78%) was higher than the hybrid BCI (90.76%) proposed, but still the hybrid BCI is paradigm option for development of ADs (high ITR of 81.10 bits/minute). The study compared the two classification protocols using the statistical t-value test, which concluded that (99.9% confidence level) the mean classification accuracy and mean ITR were greater for the single-step supervised classification and also that the mean FAR was lower for the single-step supervised classification. The proposed hybrid BCI with single-step supervised learning classification protocol emerged as best BCI option for the development of AD’s.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.