Abstract

The analysis of support systems for high office is evaluated from the perspective of an information-systems analyst. Two cases of information systems for governmental policy making institutions, one in Egypt and the other in Israel, are compared and integrated to describe the unique character of the decision-making activities in such institutions. It is argued that the underlying model of decision processes that is assumed in the design of conventional decision support systems is inadequate for very high-level policy making environments. A broader view of the decision-making activities is presented, which suggests that support systems for high level policy making require an unconventional approach for their development.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.