Abstract

Although more than half of the Earth’s population live in urban areas, we know remarkably little about most cities and what we do know is incomplete (lack of coverage) and inconsistent (varying definitions and scale). While there have been considerable advances in the derivation of a global urban mask using satellite information, the complexity of urban structures, the heterogeneity of materials, and the multiplicity of spectral properties have impeded the derivation of universal urban structural types (UST). Further, the variety of UST typologies severely limits the comparability of such studies and although a common and generic description of urban structures is an essential requirement for the universal mapping of urban structures, such a standard scheme is still lacking. More recently, there have been two developments in urban mapping that have the potential for providing a standard approach: the Local Climate Zone (LCZ) scheme (used by the World Urban Database and Access Portal Tools project) and the Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL) methodology by JRC. In this paper the LCZ scheme and the GHSL LABEL product were compared for selected cities. The comparison between both datasets revealed a good agreement at city and coarse scale, while the contingency at pixel scale was limited due to the mismatch in grid resolution and typology. At a 1 km scale, built-up as well as open and compact classes showed very good agreement in terms of correlation coefficient and mean absolute distance, spatial pattern, and radial distribution as a function of distance from town, which indicates that a decomposition relevant for modelling applications could be derived from both. On the other hand, specific problems were found for both datasets, which are discussed along with their general advantages and disadvantages as a standard for UST classification in urban remote sensing.

Highlights

  • The urban effect on the local environment has been the subject of study for more than 150 years

  • There have been two developments in urban mapping that have the potential for providing a standard approach: the World Urban Database and Portal Tools (WUDAPT) and the Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL) methodology

  • In this paper the WUDAPT-Local Climate Zone (LCZ) scheme and the GHSL LABEL product are compared based on selected cities and their advantages and disadvantages as a standard for urban structural types (UST) classification in urban remote sensing are discussed

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The urban effect on the local environment has been the subject of study for more than 150 years. These databases, which are created from available satellite data, are often supplemented with population data to yield varying estimates of the global urban footprint These footprints need to be spatially decomposed into universal urban structural types (UST) to be useful for climate studies. The GHSL methodology, designed for fully automatic production of built-up density maps, integrates several available sources that characterize global human settlement phenomena, and remotely sensed imagery. It delivers an experimental GHSL LABEL product that gathers built-up areas characteristics stratified by vegetation cover and building height (Pesaresi et al, 2016a). In this paper the WUDAPT-LCZ scheme and the GHSL LABEL product are compared based on selected cities and their advantages and disadvantages as a standard for UST classification in urban remote sensing are discussed

Global Human Settlement Layer
Local Climate Zones Mapping
D Low Plant Cover
Colour maps for visual comparison
RESULTS
Contingency
Built fractions
Detailed comparison
CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.