Abstract
With relatively few successful prosecutions and convictions for insider trading in Australia, the effectiveness and appropriateness of insider trading laws continue to be questioned. Insider trading is widely recognised as a factor which reduces investor confidence and undermines the integrity of securities markets. Consistent sentences for convicted insider traders could assist in deterring other potential offenders, and help to protect against this type of securities fraud. However, there are demonstrable inconsistencies in the sentences imposed - sentences vary from small fines, to three years imprisonment, with many variations in between. Some convicted insider traders are sentenced to full-time imprisonment, whilst others receive periodic detention or suspended sentences. Little explanation is available for such variation and inconsistency. This paper reviews all sentences imposed on convicted insider traders in Australia, and considers the wide range of penalties imposed. The factors considered most relevant to sentencing convicted insider traders are identified and analysed. Action is recommended to ensure greater consistency of sentences in the future, and thus assist in providing a greater deterrent and protective effect against insider trading.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
