Abstract
We have applied our previous immunity-based system to anomaly detection for network traffic, and confirmed that our system outperformed the single-profile method. For internal masquerader detection, the missed alarm rate was 11.21% with no false alarms. For worm detection, four random-scanning worms and the simulated metaserver worm were detected with no missed alarms and no false alarms, while a simulated passive worm was detected with a missed alarm rate of 80.57%.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
