Towards an Extensive Thumb Assist: A Comparison between Whole-Finger and Modular Types of Soft Pneumatic Actuators

Abstract

Soft pneumatic actuators used in robotic rehabilitation gloves are classified into two types: whole-finger actuators with air chambers that cover the entire finger and modular actuators with chambers only above the finger joints. Most existing prototypes provide enough finger flexion support, but insufficient independent thumb abduction or opposition support. Even the latest modular soft actuator realized thumb abduction with a sacrifice of range of motion (RoM). Moreover, the advantages and disadvantages of using the two types of soft actuators for thumb assistance have not been made clear. Without an efficient thumb assist, patients’ options for hand function rehabilitation are very limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to design a modular actuator (M-ACT) that could support multiple degrees of freedom, compare it with a whole-finger type of thumb actuator with three inner chambers (3C-ACT) in terms of the RoM, force output of thumb flexion, and abduction, and use an enhanced Kapandji test to measure both the kinematic aspect of the thumb (Kapandji score) and thumb-tip pinch force. Our results indicated superior single-DoF support capability of the M-ACT and superior multi-DoF support capability of the 3C-ACT. The use of the 3C-ACT as the thumb actuator and the M-ACT as the four-finger actuator may be the optimal solution for the soft robotic glove. This study will aid in the progression of soft robotic gloves for hand rehabilitation towards real rehabilitation practice.