Abstract

The exposure devices utilizing high-activity gamma radiation sources for industrial radiography frequently encounter issues such as stuck or disconnected sources, posing a substantial risk of radiation exposure to the workers executing emergency source retrieval operations, emphasizing the importance of accurate dose assessment. In the present study, the radiation dose to the main worker during the process of source retrieval was calculated and compared for five emergency source retrieval procedures to retrieve stuck or disconnected sources, using 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation and a mesh-type reference computational phantom. For a stuck source, the dose values of the two source retrieval procedures (i.e., repair and cut methods) were found to be relatively small, which indicates that the worker might select either method based on personal preference or situational convenience. Conversely, for a disconnected source, the dose values of the three source retrieval procedures (i.e., fishing, connect/push, and hot stick methods) were much larger and show significant differences. Notably, the fishing method was associated with the lowest dose, whereas the hot stick method resulted in significantly higher doses, differences being as large as ∼5 times. These results underscore the fishing method as a preferable option, particularly over the hot stick method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.