Abstract
This article provides a critical analysis of some accounts of welfare ideologies which have appeared in the last eight years. It is argued that in these accounts welfare ideologies have been presented as ranged along a continuum from “anti‐collectivist”, “market liberal”, or “residual” to “Marxist” or “structural” with intermediate positions variously described as “political liberal”, “reluctant collectivist”, “social democratic”, “Fabian socialist”, or “institutional”. It is further argued that these one‐dimensional accounts are seriously misleading because they fail to give sufficient recognition to the part played by conservatism in the development and justification of modern interventionist states and because they identify Marxism with collectivism and ignore the anti‐collectivist strand in socialist thought. These elements are more easily accommodated within an alternative two‐dimensional framework for the analysis of welfare ideologies which is briefly outlined.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.