Abstract

In addition to encouraging the deposit of research data into institutional data repositories, academic librarians can further support research data sharing by facilitating the deposit of data into external disciplinary data repositories. In this paper, we focus on the University of Michigan Library and Dryad, a repository for scientific and medical data, as a case study to explore possible forms of partnership between academic libraries and disciplinary data repositories. We found that although few University of Michigan researchers have submitted data to Dryad, many have recently published articles in Dryad-integrated journals, suggesting significant opportunities for Dryad use on our campus. We suggest that academic libraries could promote the sharing and preservation of science and medical data by becoming Dryad members, purchasing vouchers to cover researchers’ data submission costs, and hosting local curators who could directly work with campus researchers to improve the accuracy and completeness of data packages and thereby increase their potential for re-use. By enabling the use of both institutional and disciplinary data repositories, we argue that academic librarians can achieve greater success in capturing the vast amounts of data that presently fail to depart researchers’ hands and making that data visible to relevant communities of interest.

Highlights

  • Academic libraries are increasingly providing support for the management of research data generated on their campuses (ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, 2012; Heidorn, 2011; Fearon et al, 2013)

  • By enabling the use of both institutional and disciplinary data repositories, we argue that academic librarians can achieve greater success in capturing the vast amounts of data that presently fail to depart researchers’ hands and making that data visible to relevant communities of interest

  • Academic librarians who are motivated to capture and preserve the scholarly record of their specific institution may choose to promote the deposit of research data into their institutional repository instead of disciplinary repositories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic libraries are increasingly providing support for the management of research data generated on their campuses (ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, 2012; Heidorn, 2011; Fearon et al, 2013). Using the Dryad data repository and the University of Michigan Library as a case study, we suggest how academic libraries could forge and foster partnerships with disciplinary data repositories to more effectively support researchers on their campuses and to benefit the greater scholarly community.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call