Abstract
BackgroundInternational health partnerships are one approach to capacity building in health systems. The evidence base for institutional partnerships for health service development remains weak and evaluation of the process and outcomes of health partnerships is a priority. The variability of partnerships contributes to the challenge of understanding their effectiveness and a typology of partnerships could aid evaluation. We analysed the proposals for all of the partnerships that received funding from the Tropical Health and Education Trust in 2012–2013 to develop such a typology.MethodsOur data consisted of 54 successful project proposals for health partnerships funded by THET in 2012–2013. A coding strategy was developed and modified through five rounds of coding, discussion, modification of the coding strategy and re-coding. The final coding strategy classified partnerships according to impact, approach and relationships between partners.ResultsAll 54 (100 %) of the partnerships in our sample planned to deliver training and 30 (56 %) aimed to deliver infrastructure strengthening in addition to training. 24 (44 %) aimed to build generic skills and 30 (56 %) specialist skills. 33(61 %) of the partners based in low and middle income countries had a scope of influence at national or international level and 33 (61 %) partnerships were between partners with an equal scope of influence. We suggest that those partnerships that focus on infrastructure strengthening and the development of generic skills might have more sustainable impacts in situations of high health care worker mobility and 12/54 partnerships met these criteria.ConclusionWe classified partnerships by their impact (scope of influence of LMIC partner and focus on individual/organisational development); approach to health systems strengthening (training/infrastructure; generic/specialist) and relationships (relative scope of influence between partners; mode of delivery – with an NGO partner or not). This is a first step in generating questions about partnership effectiveness that may be answered through evaluation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12992-015-0132-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
International health partnerships are one approach to capacity building in health systems
Health partnerships are one approach to capacity building in health systems. They aim to improve health services in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and the United Kingdom (UK) through long term, sustainable collaborations that involve the reciprocal exchange of skills, knowledge and experience between partners in the UK and overseas [1]
We developed a typology of health partnerships and were able to classify all 54 partnerships funded by Tropical Health & Education Trust (THET) in 2012 using this typology
Summary
International health partnerships are one approach to capacity building in health systems. The evidence base for institutional partnerships for health service development remains weak and evaluation of the process and outcomes of health partnerships is a priority. The evidence base for health partnerships as an approach to development remains weak and evaluation of the process and outcomes of health partnerships is a priority [2]. Excluded from the analysis were grants in the categories of Start-up (total of 26 grants) and Volunteer Bursaries (total of 4, all awarded to recipients of Large Paired Institutional Partnership grants) since the start up grants enable the setup of a partnership relationship only and the volunteer bursaries fund individuals to work within an existing partnership
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
