Abstract

BackgroundInquiry-based learning is widely applied in science education; however, so far, the outcomes of learning process have been systematically assessed mainly at the secondary school level. For primary school students, there is no valid instrument for assessing the outcomes of their science inquiry. The aim of the current study was to develop a test for assessing science learning outcomes (analytical skills, planning skills, interpretation skills, and science knowledge) related to the five phases of inquiry-based learning (Orientation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Conclusion, and Discussion) at primary education level (ISCED 1).ResultsA set of contextualized science tasks was created to assess each of the learning outcomes at three levels. The Science Inquiry Test for Primary Education (SIT-PE test) was developed through several phases, including pilot studies with large groups of fourth-grade students (10 to 11 years of age). The 1 PL Item Response Theory model was used to analyze the quality of the test and items based on the test’s reliability score, item difficulty measure, infit and outfit indices, estimation of item discrimination, item-scale correlation, and the quality of the scoring key. The final test, consisting of 24 items, was used with a sample of 1868 students. The analysis showed the SIT-PE test to be of good quality on test level and item level and to also have good predictive validity. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the correlated factors model and second-order factor model of the science learning outcomes both had a good fit to data collected with the SIT-PE test. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of science learning outcomes and validated four dimensions of the model: analytical skills, planning skills, interpretation skills, and science knowledge.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the SIT-PE test could be further used for assessing students’ inquiry competence in primary education. However, it could be even further improved in several ways and this study provides guidelines on how to do that. In addition, the SIT-PE provides test developers with information on how to design derivations of the SIT-PE test for assessing particular science inquiry outcomes or the same outcomes in older age groups as well.

Highlights

  • Inquiry-based learning is one of the main approaches to learning science

  • In the first phase, an expert group consisting of science education researchers, science teacher educators, and science teachers created a list of inquiry-based learning outcomes that followed the framework developed by Pedaste, Mäeots, et al (2015): analytical skills, planning skills, interpretation skills, and necessary knowledge on the relevant topics of inquiry

  • The items of the first two versions have been further used for compiling the third version of the SITPE test as we selected the items that are of good quality and enable measuring, on three levels, students’ analytical skills, planning skills, interpretation skills, and science knowledge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inquiry-based learning is one of the main approaches to learning science (see, e.g., National Research Council, 2000; Osborne & Dillon, 2008). Many authors have emphasized that inquiry-based learning is a process where learners are actively involved (see Constantinou et al, 2018; de Jong & van Joolingen, 1998; Mäkitalo-Siegl, Kohnle, & Fischer, 2011; Pedaste, Mäeots, Leijen, & Sarapuu, 2012). This means that in doing inquiry, students need to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning process (De Jong, Kollöffel, van der Meijden, Kleine Staarman, & Janssen, 2005). The aim of the current study was to develop a test for assessing science learning outcomes (analytical skills, planning skills, interpretation skills, and science knowledge) related to the five phases of inquiry-based learning (Orientation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Conclusion, and Discussion) at primary education level (ISCED 1)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call