Abstract

Objectives: In several high-income countries, family-focused practice programs have been introduced in adult mental health care settings to identify and support children whose parents live with mental health problems. Whilst their common goal is to reduce the impact of parental mental illness on children, the mechanisms by which they improve outcomes in different systems and settings are less well known. This kind of knowledge can importantly contribute to ensuring that practice programs achieve pre-defined impacts.Methods: The aim of this study was to develop knowledge about relationships between contextual factors, mechanisms and impact that could inform a program theory for developing, implementing, and evaluating family-focused practice. Principles of a realist evaluation approach and complex system thinking were used to conceptualize the design of semi-structured in-depth interviews with individuals who led the implementation of programs. Seventeen individuals from eight countries participated in the study.Results: Interviewees provided rich accounts of the components that programs should include, contextual factors in which they operated, as well as the behavior changes in practitioners that programs needed to achieve. Together with information from the literature, we developed an initial program theory, which illustrates the interconnectedness between changes that need to co-occur in practitioners, parents, and children, many of which related to a more open communication about parental mental health problems. Stigma, risk-focused and fragmented health systems, and a lack of management commitment were the root causes explaining, for example, why conversations about parents' mental illness did not take place, or not in a way that they could help children. Enabling practitioners to focus on parents' strengths was assumed to trigger changes in knowledge, emotions and behaviors in parents that would subsequently benefit children, by reducing feelings of guilt and improving self-esteem.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first research, which synthesizes knowledge about how family-focused practice programs works in a way that it can inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs. Stakeholder, who fund, design, implement or evaluate programs should start co-developing and using program theories like the one presented in this paper to strengthen the design and delivery of family-focused practice.

Highlights

  • Family-focused practice approaches, which recognize the family as a unit in the treatment of a person’s mental health problems, have been developed and introduced in mental health services internationally

  • We focus on family-focused practice (FFP) in adult mental health settings and use the term to refer to how adult mental health practitioners and services respond to children

  • At the end of the section, we present an initial program theory that was developed based on these findings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Family-focused practice approaches, which recognize the family as a unit in the treatment of a person’s mental health problems, have been developed and introduced in mental health services internationally. They have in common that they seek to combat the limitations of services that are focused only on the individual, and do not consider the impact of mental disorders on other family members, in particular children [1, 2]. The term family-focused practice (FFP) has been used differently in different contexts, and can refer to (mental) health, social care and other sectors. We focus on FFP in adult mental health settings and use the term to refer to how adult mental health practitioners and services respond to children

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call