Abstract
The intensity of IP protection has traditionally been determined by assessing the criteria that need to be satisfied for the protection to be granted, as well as the scope of rights and limitations of those rights. The enforcement stage and the remedies available to right holders have for long been, if not neglected, then certainly treated with lesser attention. The rise of aggressive litigation strategies, especially in the field of patents, has brought the enforcement stage to the forefront of the discussion about the proper level of IP protection in general and patent law in particular. Injunctions provide particularly strong leverage at the enforcement stage, allowing patentees in some cases to obtain royalties that exceed the value of the protected inventions. The principle of proportionality can play an important role as a check on excessive litigation strategies by patentees. Flexibility, however, comes at the price of uncertainty and unpredictability as to the outcome of patent disputes. Therefore, it is crucial to apply proportionality in an orderly and structured manner. For that purpose, the article identifies a set of factors that may be helpful in applying proportionality in patent disputes. That set of factors is well grounded in the traditions of the laws of the EU Member States.
Highlights
International treaties concerning both copyright and industrial property protection have traditionally been preoccupied with ensuring a high level of protection forR
At the international level this changed with the adoption of the TRIPS Agreement,2 Part III of which deals with enforcement of intellectual property rights
It is a great paradox that English courts have fully given up their own concept of grossly disproportionate and embraced the proportionality of Directive 2004/48, just to leave the EU, whereas Germany – the country where the concept originated – has for such a long time remained so sceptical about introducing it into its patent legislation
Summary
International treaties concerning both copyright and industrial property protection have traditionally been preoccupied with ensuring a high level of protection for. In the European Union there has been a steady tendency to achieve ever higher levels of intellectual property protection. At both the international and EU level, relatively little attention has been paid to enforcement of intellectual property rights. At the international level this changed with the adoption of the TRIPS Agreement, Part III of which deals with enforcement of intellectual property rights.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
