Abstract

Pension policy is by far nationally embedded and systems differ in accordance with the socio-economic specificities and sensitivities of each country. Nevertheless, there is one general trend in policies across Europe; a constant shift from public pay-as-you-go to privately funded schemes, giving birth to various formulae of “complementary” or “supplementary” or, when work-related, “occupational” pensions. This shift is justified by the demographic ageing and its burden on national public finances, but it is also initiated by the European integration project itself, that increasingly calls for a “pension fund capitalism”. However, a genuine single market for occupational pensions remains a far-reaching goal and, in order to realize why, one has to go beyond the framework of the so-called pension funds Directive 2003/41/EC. Old Europe used to be divided ideologically and politically in Bismarck and Beveridge-type countries; it used to distinguish between “stakeholder” and “shareholder” economy. New Europe is the constant struggle for striking a fair balance. At a time when the frontiers between financial service providers are blurring, it is the constant interplay between regulators/supervisors and interest groups that will determine the degree of solidarity and security within funded schemes in an integrated financial services market.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.