Abstract

The excessive fear of being negatively evaluated constitutes a central component of social anxiety (SA). Models posit that selective attention to threat and biased interpretations of ambiguous stimuli contribute to the maintenance of this psychopathology. There is strong support for the existence of processing biases but most of the available evidence comes from face research. Emotions are, however, not only conveyed through facial cues, but also through other channels, such as vocal and postural cues. These non-facial cues have yet received much less attention. We therefore plead for a cross-modal investigation of biases in SA. We argue that the inclusion of new modalities may be an efficient research tool to (1) address the specificity or generalizability of these biases; (2) offer an insight into the potential influence of SA on cross-modal processes; (3) operationalize emotional ambiguity by manipulating cross-modal emotional congruency; (4) inform the debate about the role of top-down and bottom-up factors in biasing attention; and (5) probe the cross-modal generalizability of cognitive training. Theoretical and clinical implications as well as potential fruitful avenues for research are discussed.

Highlights

  • Influential models of social anxiety (SA) implicate cognitive biases as maintaining factors (Clark and Wells, 1995; Rapee and Heimberg, 1997)

  • Brosch et al (2009) replicated and extended these behavioral findings by showing an amplification of the P1 for visual targets occurring at the spatial location of angry as compared to neutral prosody. These results suggest that emotional attention can operate across modalities because auditory stimuli can enhance early visual processing stages

  • In addition to the gain of a more complete and ecological picture of cognitive biases, a cross-modal perspective opens up new possibilities for understanding fundamental processes underlying biases in SA

Read more

Summary

HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE

Towards a cross-modal perspective of emotional perception in social anxiety: review and future directions. Conveyed through facial cues, and through other channels, such as vocal and postural cues. These non-facial cues have yet received much less attention. We argue that the inclusion of new modalities may be an efficient research tool to (1) address the specificity or generalizability of these biases; (2) offer an insight into the potential influence of SA on cross-modal processes; (3) operationalize emotional ambiguity by manipulating cross-modal emotional congruency; (4) inform the debate about the role of top-down and bottom-up factors in biasing attention; and (5) probe the cross-modal generalizability of cognitive training. Theoretical and clinical implications as well as potential fruitful avenues for research are discussed

INTRODUCTION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call