Towards a better understanding of crop water requirement in orchards: a case study from the Goulburn Valley

Abstract

Responses of fruit trees to reduced irrigation in micro-irrigated peach and apple orchards in the Goulburn Valley, Victoria were investigated during the 2000–01 season. Field experiments examined the effects of applying 2 irrigation levels on soil water content, crop water relations, vegetative growth, yield, yield components and fruit quality. Irrigation regimes were 50% and 100% of current management practice where inputs are scheduled from pan evaporation and locally derived crop coefficients. Water was applied to only one side of the tree rootzone in the 50% treatment (0.5I) while the current management practice treatment (1.0I), received water on both sides of the tree. Over the season, the irrigation inputs for peach and apple equated to a crop coefficient of 0.93 and 0.87, respectively. Orchard water use (ETpeach and ETapple) was predicted using reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) and published crop coefficients (Kc) with adjustment for the fraction of shade cast by the trees on the orchard floor at solar noon (effective canopy cover, ECC). Throughout the season, ECC measured as midday tree canopy radiation interception, remained low for both peach and apple (<35%). ETpeach and ETapple were substantially lower than current water scheduling practices (1.0I treatments). For the 0.5I apple regime, irrigation closely matched ETapple suggesting that these trees were adequately irrigated. This was supported by no detrimental effects on crop production, vegetative growth, and fruit quality measures of the 0.5I irrigation regime. However, in the peach orchard the 0.5I regime reduced fruit volume suggesting that these trees may have been water stressed. Based on ECC, we calculated the full crop water requirement Kc for the peach and apple orchards to be 0.42 and 0.37, respectively. In summary, for the apple orchard, our 0.5I treatment was close to predicted full crop water requirement (ETapple). But for the peach orchard, the ETpeach was greater, albeit slightly, than our 0.5I regime. Taken overall, these results demonstrate that better matching of water application to the evaporative surface of the orchard canopies (i.e. ECC) can substantially reduce irrigation water use in Goulburn Valley orchards. It is also apparent that ECC in these orchards where row spacing is typically 4–5 m can be relatively low.