Abstract

The Journal of Veterans Studies (ISSN 2470-4768) is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. The goals of the journal are to sustain international research in veterans studies, facilitate interdisciplinary research collaborations, and narrow gaps between cultures, institutions, experiences, knowledge, and understanding.We understand veterans studies as a multi-faceted, scholarly investigation of military veterans and their families. Topics within that investigation could include but are not limited to, combat exposure, reintegration challenges, and the complex systems and institutions (VA) that shape the veteran experience. Veterans studies, by its very nature, may analyze experiences closely tied to military studies, but the emphasis of veterans studies is the “veteran experience,” i.e., what happens after the service member departs the armed forces.The work of veterans studies can be found in such fields as higher education, humanities, social and behavioral sciences, and student affairs (among many others). Additionally, it can be seen in and out of formal education: by current members of the military, leaders of nonprofits, artists, activists, and students taking courses in veterans studies. Such research and work can take multiple forms. The journal is open to multimodal submissions in a variety of formats. We support the practical application of new knowledge regarding veterans studies to veteran and non-veteran (active duty, business, nonprofit, artists, activists) audiences as well as research that moves the field of veterans studies forward. Our acceptance rate* is 69% *rate includes desk-reject submissions and only accounts for submissions received between 01/01/2019 to present.

Highlights

  • The engagement of consumers in health-related research is a widely accepted goal within the scientific community

  • There is a critical need for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and veteran-centered outcomes research (V-COR) to inform high value, efficacious healthcare for our nation’s veterans (Eckardt, et al, 2017)

  • While many veteran participants across all six states expressed enthusiasm and interest in participating in PCOR and CER, profound mistrust and skepticism of the research process emerged as a strong reoccurring theme

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The engagement of consumers in health-related research is a widely accepted goal within the scientific community. Despite a critical need for evidence-based approaches to service-related health issues, veterans are frequently reluctant to partner with or participate in the research enterprise (Bush, Sheppard, Fantell, & Bell, 2013; Braun, Kennedy, Sadler, & Dixon, 2015; Littman, True, Ashmore, Wellens, & Smith, 2018; Williams, Gatien, & Hagerty, 2012; Funderburk, Spinola, & Maisto, 2015) The purpose of this multi-state project was to invite veterans to dialogue about (1) their research priorities; (2) perceived barriers to research participation; (3) recommended strategies for engaging veterans in research; and (4) their preferences for receiving research findings. There is a critical need for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and veteran-centered outcomes research (V-COR) to inform high value, efficacious healthcare for our nation’s veterans (Eckardt, et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call