Abstract

This article presents the first empirical test of Wildavsky's model of self‐evaluation by public organizations. We elucidate Wildavsky's arguments and identify six variables that have theoretical effects on self‐evaluation. A statistical model that incorporates these variables explains 46 percent of the variation in self‐evaluation. The evidence suggests that self‐evaluation is positively related to leadership support and employee involvement, and negatively related to the number of organizational sub‐units undertaking evaluation at the same time. Refinements to the Wildavsky model are proposed, and conclusions are drawn on the theory and practice of self‐evaluation by public organizations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.