Abstract

Many mating signals consist of multimodal components that need decoding by several sensory modalities on the receiver’s side. For methodological and conceptual reasons, the communicative functions of these signals are often investigated only one at a time. Likewise, variation of single signal traits are frequently correlated by researchers with senders’ quality or receivers’ behavioural responses. Consequently, the two classic and still dominating hypotheses regarding the communicative meaning of multimodal mating signals postulate that different components either serve as back-up messages or provide multiple meanings. Here we discuss how this conceptual dichotomy might have hampered a more integrative, perception encompassing understanding of multimodal communication: neither the multiple message nor the back-up signal hypotheses address the possibility that multimodal signals are integrated neurally into one percept. Therefore when studying multimodal mating signals, we should be aware that multimodal signals can give rise to multimodal percepts, meaning that receivers can gain access to additional information inherent to only combined signal components (‘the whole is something different than the sum of its parts’). We review the evidence for the importance of multimodal percepts and outline potential avenues for discovery of multimodal percepts in animal communication.

Highlights

  • Specialty section: This article was submitted to Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

  • The two classic and still dominating hypotheses regarding the communicative meaning of multimodal mating signals postulate that different components either serve as back-up messages or provide multiple meanings

  • We review the evidence for the importance of multimodal percepts and outline potential avenues for discovery of multimodal percepts in animal communication

Read more

Summary

Toward Testing for Multimodal Perception of Mating Signals

Wouter Halfwerk 1*, Judith Varkevisser 2, Ralph Simon 1, Ezequiel Mendoza 3, Constance Scharff 3 and Katharina Riebel 2. The two classic and still dominating hypotheses regarding the communicative meaning of multimodal mating signals postulate that different components either serve as back-up messages or provide multiple meanings. We discuss how this conceptual dichotomy might have hampered a more integrative, perception encompassing understanding of multimodal communication: neither the multiple message nor the back-up signal hypotheses address the possibility that multimodal signals are integrated neurally into one percept. When studying multimodal mating signals, we should be aware that they can give rise to multimodal percepts. This means that receivers can gain access to additional information inherent in combined signal components only (“the whole is something different than the sum of its parts”).

MULTIMODALITY IS A CHARACTERISTIC OF MANY MATING SIGNALS
Multimodal perception
Unity assumption
MULTIMODAL PERCEPTION IN MATE ATTRACTION AND RESOURCE DEFENSE
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call