Abstract

Contemporary efforts for empirically-unbiased modeling of protein-ligand interactions entail a painful tradeoff – as reliable information on both noncovalent binding factors and the dynamic behavior of a protein-ligand complex is often beyond practical limits. We demonstrate that information drawn exclusively from static molecular structures can be used for reproducing and predicting experimentally-measured binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes. In particular, inhibition constants (Ki) were calculated for seven different competitive inhibitors of Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase using a multiple-linear-regression-based model. The latter, incorporating five independent variables – drawn from QM cluster, DLPNO-CCSD(T) calculations and LED analyses on the seven complexes, each containing active amino-acid residues found within interacting distance (3.5 Å) from the corresponding ligand – is shown to recover 99.9% of the sum of squares for measured Ki values, while having no statistically-significant residual errors. Despite being fitted to a small number of data points, leave-one-out cross-validation statistics suggest that it possesses surprising predictive value (Q2LOO=0.78, or 0.91 upon removal of a single outlier). This thus challenges ligand-invariant definitions of active sites, such as implied in the lock-key binding theory, as well as in alternatives highlighting shape-complementarity without taking electronic effects into account. Broader implications of the current work are discussed in dedicated appendices.

Highlights

  • • We have seen that informative, static molecular structures

  • predict ones not included in the fitting process

  • All geometries used in this work were obtained in the following manner

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The main aim of this paper is introducing a path toward solving this dilemma – employing electronic structure calculations on static molecular structures that provide some important information on the dynamic nature of PL binding processes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call