Abstract
This paper deals with the question of predicting quality in key informant data. The concept of precision (closeness of key informants' responses to the actual nature of the quantitative and qualitative domains on which they are reporting) is introduced and measured in a research setting where key informant reliability (agreement) has been assessed by other field workers. It is shown that it is possible to control the quality of key informant data because informants appear to be reliable and precise in similar domains and unreliable and imprecise in other domains of reporting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
