Toward hippocampal volume measures on ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive comparison study between deep learning and conventional approaches.

Abstract

The hippocampus is a complex brain structure that plays an important role in various cognitive aspects such as memory, intelligence, executive function, and path integration. The volume of this highly plastic structure is identified as one of the most important biomarkers of specific neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. It has also been extensively investigated in numerous aging studies. However, recent studies on aging show that the performance of conventional approaches in measuring the hippocampal volume is still far from satisfactory, especially in terms of delivering longitudinal measures from ultra-high field magnetic resonance images (MRIs), which can visualize more boundary details. The advancement of deep learning provides an alternative solution to measuring the hippocampal volume. In this work, we comprehensively compared a deep learning pipeline based on nnU-Net with several conventional approaches including Freesurfer, FSL and DARTEL, for automatically delivering hippocampal volumes: (1) Firstly, we evaluated the segmentation accuracy and precision on a public dataset through cross-validation. Results showed that the deep learning pipeline had the lowest mean (L = 1.5%, R = 1.7%) and the lowest standard deviation (L = 5.2%, R = 6.2%) in terms of volume percentage error. (2) Secondly, sub-millimeter MRIs of a group of healthy adults with test-retest 3T and 7T sessions were used to extensively assess the test-retest reliability. Results showed that the deep learning pipeline achieved very high intraclass correlation coefficients (L = 0.990, R = 0.986 for 7T; L = 0.985, R = 0.983 for 3T) and very small volume percentage differences (L = 1.2%, R = 0.9% for 7T; L = 1.3%, R = 1.3% for 3T). (3) Thirdly, a Bayesian linear mixed effect model was constructed with respect to the hippocampal volumes of two healthy adult datasets with longitudinal 7T scans and one disease-related longitudinal dataset. It was found that the deep learning pipeline detected both the subtle and disease-related changes over time with high sensitivity as well as the mild differences across subjects. Comparison results from the aforementioned three aspects showed that the deep learning pipeline significantly outperformed the conventional approaches by large margins. Results also showed that the deep learning pipeline can better accommodate longitudinal analysis purposes.