Abstract

Goal clarity is an essential element of classroom dialogue and a component of effective instruction. Until now, teachers have been struggling to implement goal clarity in the classroom dialogue. In the present study, we investigated the classroom practice of teachers in a video-based intervention called the Dialogic Video Cycle (DVC) and compared it to the classroom practice of teachers in a traditional control group. We conducted video analysis (N = 20 lessons) of teaching practices at the beginning (pre-test) and at the end of the school year (post-test). Furthermore, we performed video analysis of intervention group teacher discussions during DVC meetings (N = 6 meetings). Comparative analysis between groups revealed changes in teaching practices towards better goal clarity for DVC teachers in comparison to the traditional control group. In-depth analysis of teacher discussions during DVC meetings showed that teachers continuously focused on goal clarity as the content of teacher professional development (TPD). They shared learning experiences and were actively involved in TPD learning activities. The study illustrates how components of effective TPD programs (content focus, social and active learning) translated into redefining and changing the teaching practice.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Introduction of the ProblemClassroom dialogue is the predominant mode of teaching in many classrooms all over the world (Mercer & Dawes, 2014)

  • In-depth analysis of teacher discussions during Dialogic Video Cycle (DVC) meetings showed that teachers continuously focused on goal clarity as the content of teacher professional development (TPD)

  • The findings of this study show that teachers participating in the DVC changed their dialogic teaching practices and incorporated elements of goal clarity more explicitly compared to teachers in the Advanced Traditional Program (ATP) program

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Classroom dialogue is the predominant mode of teaching in many classrooms all over the world (Mercer & Dawes, 2014) It is typically dominated by a rigid interaction pattern (Mehan, 1979; Resnick, Asterhan, & Clarke, 2015) and does not motivate students sufficiently to participate in discourse (Seidel & Prenzel, 2006). In this context, teachers fail to explicate learning goals and to verbally structure the course of the lessons well (Hugener et al, 2009; Seidel, Rimmele, & Prenzel, 2005). The DVC is a video-based TPD program focusing on productive classroom dialogue (Gröschner, Seidel, Kiemer, & Pehmer, 2015).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call