Abstract

This paper proposes how various disciplinary theories of cognition may be combined into a unifying, sub-symbolic, computational theory of cognition. The following theories are considered for integration: psychological theories, including the theory of event coding, event segmentation theory, the theory of anticipatory behavioral control, and concept development; artificial intelligence and machine learning theories, including reinforcement learning and generative artificial neural networks; and theories from theoretical and computational neuroscience, including predictive coding and free energy-based inference. In the light of such a potential unification, it is discussed how abstract cognitive, conceptualized knowledge and understanding may be learned from actively gathered sensorimotor experiences. The unification rests on the free energy-based inference principle, which essentially implies that the brain builds a predictive, generative model of its environment. Neural activity-oriented inference causes the continuous adaptation of the currently active predictive encodings. Neural structure-oriented inference causes the longer term adaptation of the developing generative model as a whole. Finally, active inference strives for maintaining internal homeostasis, causing goal-directed motor behavior. To learn abstract, hierarchical encodings, however, it is proposed that free energy-based inference needs to be enhanced with structural priors, which bias cognitive development toward the formation of particular, behaviorally suitable encoding structures. As a result, it is hypothesized how abstract concepts can develop from, and thus how they are structured by and grounded in, sensorimotor experiences. Moreover, it is sketched-out how symbol-like thought can be generated by a temporarily active set of predictive encodings, which constitute a distributed neural attractor in the form of an interactive free-energy minimum. The activated, interactive network attractor essentially characterizes the semantics of a concept or a concept composition, such as an actual or imagined situation in our environment. Temporal successions of attractors then encode unfolding semantics, which may be generated by a behavioral or mental interaction with an actual or imagined situation in our environment. Implications, further predictions, possible verification, and falsifications, as well as potential enhancements into a fully spelled-out unified theory of cognition are discussed at the end of the paper.

Highlights

  • Theories on embodied cognition (EC) have come a long way (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980, 1999; Barsalou, 1999; Bergen, 2012; Clark, 2013)

  • EC is typically differentiated into (a) embodiment itself, which focuses on how the body with its particular sensory and motor capabilities and its physical properties shapes the way we think, (b) grounded cognition, which emphasizes that our experiences are grounded in our physical world with its particular properties, and (c) situatedness, which points out that our experiences are strongly influenced by our culture, society, and language (Pezzulo et al, 2013)

  • Quantitative theories—or even better, neuro-cognitive models—of embodiment are needed to shed more concrete light on EC and its implications for cognition as a whole. To develop such a computational theory, I propose to integrate the insights gained from EC into the theoretical frameworks of predictive coding (Rao and Ballard, 1998; Friston, 2002; König and Krüger, 2006; Kilner et al, 2007), free energy-based inference (Friston, 2005, 2008, 2010; Bastos et al, 2012; Adams et al, 2013; Friston et al, 2015), anticipatory behavior (Hoffmann, 1993, 2003; Butz et al, 2003; Butz, 2008; Pezzulo et al, 2009; Engel et al, 2013), events and event segmentation (Hommel et al, 2001; Zacks et al, 2007), and cognitive development (Konczak et al, 1997; Mandler, 2004; von Hofsten, 2004; Rochat, 2010; Mandler, 2012)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Theories on embodied cognition (EC) have come a long way (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980, 1999; Barsalou, 1999; Bergen, 2012; Clark, 2013). Quantitative theories—or even better, neuro-cognitive models—of embodiment are needed to shed more concrete light on EC and its implications for cognition as a whole To develop such a computational theory, I propose to integrate the insights gained from EC into the theoretical frameworks of predictive coding (Rao and Ballard, 1998; Friston, 2002; König and Krüger, 2006; Kilner et al, 2007), free energy-based inference (Friston, 2005, 2008, 2010; Bastos et al, 2012; Adams et al, 2013; Friston et al, 2015), anticipatory behavior (Hoffmann, 1993, 2003; Butz et al, 2003; Butz, 2008; Pezzulo et al, 2009; Engel et al, 2013), events and event segmentation (Hommel et al, 2001; Zacks et al, 2007), and cognitive development (Konczak et al, 1997; Mandler, 2004; von Hofsten, 2004; Rochat, 2010; Mandler, 2012). As a result of the structurallybiased free energy-based inference processes, the development of particular types of predictive encodings can be expected to be involved and to be selectively activated while interacting with or thinking about the environment

Theory Background
Contributions
Roadmap
PROGRESSIVELY DEVELOPING PARTICULAR PREDICTIVE ENCODINGS
From Sensorimotor to General Temporal Predictive Encodings
Three Fundamental Types of Predictive
Event Segmentation
Event Schemata
Abstraction and Hierarchical
LEARNING BY FORMULATIONS OF
Learning Different Types of Predictive
GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR AND COGNITION
Active Inference and Homeostasis
Overall Cognitive Processing Loop
SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.