Abstract
In the last two decades in Africa, a wave of democratization swept across the continent, where over fifty-seven new constitutions were adopted (Wing, 2008). However, these new constitutions did not translate into increased democratic space for the citizens. The failure of new constitutional dispensation to translate into tangible progress in improvement of governance in some countries such as Egypt raises pertinent questions. Why have Africa’s constitutions failed or proved to be largely ineffective? The answer seems to lie more in the process (how) than the product (constitution itself). Success, in this respect, lies not so much in reformulating the rules that govern society through writing new constitutions, but on the process of establishing governmental and institutional legitimacy. The persistence of poor governance in spite of many decades of constitution making buttresses the view of the existence of “constitutions without constitutionalism” in Africa (Ihonvbere, 2003). Constitutions often reflect elite interests, as it is often a product of elite capture. This brings with it a focus on civil society advocacy for a “people-driven” constitution-making process, with particular attention to their experiences of (non) participation, as well as their understanding and mobilization of broader “popular participation,” in the process (Hayward, 2010). It is in this context that this chapter explores the challenges of constitution making in Kenya.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.