Abstract

The interactive-alignment account of dialogue proposes that interlocutors achieve conversational success by aligning their understanding of the situation under discussion. Such alignment occurs because they prime each other at different levels of representation (e.g., phonology, syntax, semantics), and this is possible because these representations are shared across production and comprehension. In this paper, we briefly review the behavioral evidence, and then consider how findings from cognitive neuroscience might lend support to this account, on the assumption that alignment of neural activity corresponds to alignment of mental states. We first review work supporting representational parity between production and comprehension, and suggest that neural activity associated with phonological, lexical, and syntactic aspects of production and comprehension are closely related. We next consider evidence for the neural bases of the activation and use of situation models during production and comprehension, and how these demonstrate the activation of non-linguistic conceptual representations associated with language use. We then review evidence for alignment of neural mechanisms that are specific to the act of communication. Finally, we suggest some avenues of further research that need to be explored to test crucial predictions of the interactive alignment account.

Highlights

  • Conversation involves an extremely complicated set of processes in which participants have to interweave their activities with precise timing, and yet it is a skill that all speakers seem very good at (Garrod and Pickering, 2004)

  • One argument for why conversation is so easy is that interlocutors tend to become aligned at different levels of linguistic representation and find it easier to perform this joint activity than the individual activities of speaking or listening (Garrod and Pickering, 2009)

  • At the level of situation models, interlocutors align on spatial reference frames: if one speaker refers to objects egocentrically (e.g., “on the left” to mean on the speaker’s left), the other speaker tends to use an egocentric perspective as well (Watson et al, 2004)

Read more

Summary

Toward a neural basis of interactive alignment in conversation

Edited by: Chris Frith, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at University College London, UK. The interactive-alignment account of dialogue proposes that interlocutors achieve conversational success by aligning their understanding of the situation under discussion. Such alignment occurs because they prime each other at different levels of representation (e.g., phonology, syntax, semantics), and this is possible because these representations are shared across production and comprehension. We first review work supporting representational parity between production and comprehension, and suggest that neural activity associated with phonological, lexical, and syntactic aspects of production and comprehension are closely related. We consider evidence for the neural bases of the activation and use of situation models during production and comprehension, and how these demonstrate the activation of non-linguistic conceptual representations associated with language use.

INTRODUCTION
Neural basis of interactive alignment
NEURAL EVIDENCE
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call