Abstract
Motivation to transfer is often examined in training evaluation studies and reflects the trainee’s willingness to apply new knowledge and skills acquired from training to the job. Based on organismic integration theory within the framework of self-determination theory, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were used to test one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, second-order factor, bifactor-CFA, and bifactor-ESEM representations of the Transfer Motivation Questionnaire (TMQ) survey data obtained from 241 trainees. The bifactor-ESEM solution proved to have the best model fit, but factor loadings on the general factor were weak. A four-factor CFA model was the most optimal solution, with factors representing external, introjected, identified, and integrated regulation. To test external validity of the TMQ scales, associations with transfer self-efficacy, interest in transfer, utility values, and transfer intentions were examined, as well as effects of the participants’ age, gender, work experience, education level, and voluntary participation status.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.