Toward a more realistic estimate of exposure to chromium and nickel in soils of geogenic and/or anthropogenic origin: importance of oral bioaccessibility.

Abstract

To enhance risk assessment for contaminated sites, incorporating bioavailability through bioaccessibility as a corrective factor to total concentration is essential to provide a more realistic estimate of exposure. While the main in vitro tests have been validated for As, Cd, and/or Pb, their potential for assessing the bioaccessibility of additional elements remains underexplored. In this study, the physicochemical parameters, pseudototal Cr and Ni concentrations, soil phase distribution, and oral bioaccessibility of twenty-seven soil samples were analysed using both the ISO 17924 standard and a simplified test based on hydrochloric acid. The results showed wide variability in terms of the concentrations (from 31 to 21,079mgkg-1 for Cr, and from 26 to 11,663mgkg-1 for Ni) and generally low bioaccessibility for Cr and Ni, with levels below 20% and 30%, respectively. Bioaccessibility variability was greater for anthropogenic soils, while geogenic enriched soils exhibited low bioaccessibility. The soil parameters had an influence on bioaccessibility, but the effects depended on the soils of interest. Sequential extractions provided the most comprehensive explanation for bioaccessibility. Cr and Ni were mostly associated with the residual fraction, indicating limited bioaccessibility. Ni was distributed in all phases, whereas Cr was absent from the most mobile phase, which may explain the lower bioaccessibility of Cr compared to that of Ni. The study showed promising results for the use of the simplified test to predict Cr and Ni bioaccessibility, and its importance for more accurate human exposure evaluation and effective soil management practices.