Abstract
A paradigm shift is how the legal change after the advancement of information technology has been described. Looking for the next paradigm, this article suggests an approach to initiate the change. Rawls's concept of public reason and Dworkin's theory of adjudication form a consistent chain of thought and are consistently critiqued by the cooriginality thesis of Habermas. The discussions of their theoretical exchanges lead to an idea of public conflict resolution emphasizing the dialectic relationship between the court and alternate dispute resolution. The latter can be a discursive public sphere on the internet which is critical for leading us to the next legal paradigm.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
