Abstract
The ferment that presently characterizes constitutional theory is partly the product of renewed interest in hermeneutical questions. The oft-debated issues of how to determine the meaning of a text, the status of the framers' intentions, the historicity of language, and the consequences of conceptual change in the law are properly understood as hermeneutical problems. In this paper I argue that the adoption of a hermeneutical perspective allows constitutional theorists to address the salient problems in a new and beneficial light. The chief virtue of constitutional hermeneutics is that of deepening the self-understanding of constitutional interpreters who seek to gain a better grasp of the philosophical presuppositions of their practical activity. This theoretical virtue manifests itself on the practical level by providing the means for a clearer-perhaps even truer-understanding of contemporary constitutional meaning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.